NetBeans 4.1 Performance Survey
The survey is closed.
Results Summary
Q1a: Specify your HW configuration - RAM:
( 8%) RAM <= 256MB
( 2%) RAM = 384MB
(35%) RAM = 512MB
( 6%) RAM = 768MB
(38%) RAM = 1GB
(10%) RAM > 1GB
Q1b: Specify your HW configuration - CPU frequency:
( 9%) CPU <= 1GHz
(46%) 1GHz < CPU <= 2GHz
(45%) CPU > 2GHz
Q1c: Specify your HW configuration - number of CPUs:
(93%) 1 CPU
( 6%) 2 CPUs
( 1%) > 2 CPUs
Q2: Which operating systems do you use NetBeans 4.1 on?
(69%) Windows XP
(17%) Windows 2000/NT
( 1%) Windows other
(33%) Linux
( 3%) Solaris SPARC
( 2%) Solaris x86
( 3%) MacOS
( 1%) OS/2
( 1%) FreeBSD
Q3: Which JDK version do you run the NetBeans IDE on?
( 2%) Sun JDK 1.4.0(_xx)
( 1%) Sun JDK 1.4.1(_xx)
(36%) Sun JDK 1.4.2(_xx)
(81%) Sun JDK 1.5.0(_xx)
( 2%) Sun JDK 1.6.0 EA
Q4: Do you use any additional command-line switches to tune the VM performance (-Xmx, -Xms, -incgc, etc.)?
(80%) no
(20%) yes
Q5: What size (number of java files) is the largest project you use with NetBeans 4.1?
( 3%) > 10.000
( 5%) 5.000 - 10.000
(17%) 1.000 - 5.000
(34%) 100 - 1.000
(21%) 50 - 100
(20%) < 50
Q6: How would you rate the overall responsiveness of NetBeans 4.1?
(12%) great
(52%) good
(29%) fair
( 6%) bad
( 1%) terrible
Q7: How would you rate the speed with which menus appear (including context menus)?
(19%) great
(53%) good
(23%) fair
( 4%) bad
( 1%) terrible
Q8: How would you rate the responsiveness of browsing packages and files in the explorer?
(18%) great
(51%) good
(25%) fair
( 5%) bad
( 1%) terrible
Q9: How would you rate the responsiveness of typing in the editor?
(22%) great
(51%) good
(22%) fair
( 4%) bad
( 1%) terrible
Q10: How would you rate the responsiveness of navigating (scrolling, moving around in files, switching between files) in the editor?
(21%) great
(49%) good
(23%) fair
( 7%) bad
( 1%) terrible
Q11: How would you rate the responsiveness of the editor's code-completion?
( 9%) great
(29%) good
(36%) fair
(18%) bad
( 6%) terrible
( 2%) I haven't used it
Q12: How would you rate the responsiveness of stepping through code in the debugger?
(10%) great
(32%) good
(24%) fair
( 9%) bad
( 3%) terrible
(23%) I haven't used it
Q13: How would you rate the responsiveness of browsing debugging information in the debugger?
( 9%) great
(32%) good
(25%) fair
( 7%) bad
( 3%) terrible
(25%) I haven't used it
Q14: How would you rate the performance of compilation?
(28%) great
(44%) good
(18%) fair
( 7%) bad
( 2%) terrible
(<1%) I haven't used it
Q15: How would you rate the responsiveness of Version Control related functionality?
( 6%) great
(19%) good
(20%) fair
( 5%) bad
( 2%) terrible
(48%) I haven't used it
Q16: How would you rate the responsiveness of Web and J2EE application development?
( 8%) great
(26%) good
(15%) fair
( 4%) bad
( 2%) terrible
(45%) I haven't used it
Q17: How would you rate the performance of deployment to Tomcat and Sun Java System Application Server?
(11%) great
(24%) good
(13%) fair
( 4%) bad
( 3%) terrible
(46%) I haven't used it
Q18: How often do you use NetBeans 4.1 during your work day?
(71%) most of the time, the IDE is my main application
(25%) occasionally, for specific tasks
( 4%) rarely
Q19: How often do you launch NetBeans 4.1?
(42%) several times a day
(34%) once a day
(18%) several times a week
( 6%) once a week
Q20: Do you see the startup time of NetBeans 4.1 as a problem?
(27%) no, it starts fast enough
(64%) no, but I would appreciate it being faster
( 9%) yes, it is a big problem for me
Q21: Have you ever experienced gradual performance degradation that could only be remedied by restarting NetBeans 4.1?
(44%) no
(46%) sometimes
(11%) frequently
Q22: Have you ever encountered an OutOfMemoryError with NetBeans 4.1?
(80%) no
(18%) sometimes
( 2%) frequently
